Pakistan vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, timber

Pakistan
2.35 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Pakistan rank
93rd
Suriname rank
94th

Renewable natural capital, timber over time

  • Pakistan
  • Suriname
01.0B2.0B3.0B199520072020

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 2.35 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 204.50 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 94th of 151 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 2.93 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ 748.96 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2000s 2.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.17 billion real chained 2019 US$ 553.15 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2010s 2.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.15 billion real chained 2019 US$ 330.86 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan
2020s 2.35 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ 204.50 million real chained 2019 US$ Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Pakistan or Suriname?
Pakistan, at 2.35 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.14 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Pakistan and Suriname?
204.50 million real chained 2019 US$, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Pakistan and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
Pakistan ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 94th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/pakistan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/pakistan/suriname/">Pakistan vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.