New Zealand vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, timber

New Zealand
57.54 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
61.65 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
13th
South Africa rank
11th

Renewable natural capital, timber over time

  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
020.0B40.0B60.0B199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 61.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 57.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 4.11 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 151 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 56.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 64.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.21 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 57.29 billion real chained 2019 US$ 63.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.40 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 57.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 62.37 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.04 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 57.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ 61.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.11 billion real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, New Zealand or South Africa?
South Africa, at 61.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 57.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between New Zealand and South Africa?
4.11 billion real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
New Zealand ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 11th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/new-zealand/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/new-zealand/south-africa/">New Zealand vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.