Kyrgyzstan vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, timber

Kyrgyzstan
27.66 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Singapore
14.62 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
137th
Singapore rank
140th

Renewable natural capital, timber over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Singapore
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M30.0M199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 27.66 million real chained 2019 US$ against 14.62 million real chained 2019 US$ in Singapore, a difference of 13.04 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.9 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Singapore ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 140th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 9.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.36 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.63 million real chained 2019 US$ Singapore
2000s 16.90 million real chained 2019 US$ 16.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 622,690 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 24.43 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.65 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.77 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 27.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.62 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.04 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Kyrgyzstan or Singapore?
Kyrgyzstan, at 27.66 million real chained 2019 US$ against 14.62 million real chained 2019 US$ in Singapore as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Kyrgyzstan and Singapore?
13.04 million real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 140th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/singapore/">Kyrgyzstan vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.