Guinea vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, timber

Guinea
14.50 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
12.07 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
38th
Papua New Guinea rank
41st

Renewable natural capital, timber over time

  • Guinea
  • Papua New Guinea
05.0B10.0B15.0B199520072020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 14.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 12.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2.43 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 38th and Papua New Guinea ranks 41st of 151 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 16.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2000s 15.99 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.20 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.80 billion real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2010s 15.05 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.13 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.92 billion real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2020s 14.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.43 billion real chained 2019 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Guinea or Papua New Guinea?
Guinea, at 14.50 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 12.07 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Guinea and Papua New Guinea?
2.43 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
Guinea ranks 38th and Papua New Guinea ranks 41st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/papua-new-guinea/">Guinea vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.