Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, timber

Bangladesh
1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
953.50 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bangladesh rank
107th
Sri Lanka rank
108th

Renewable natural capital, timber over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sri Lanka
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199520072020

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 953.50 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 55.33 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 151 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 1.03 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.00 billion real chained 2019 US$ 26.12 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2000s 1.02 billion real chained 2019 US$ 964.84 million real chained 2019 US$ 56.06 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2010s 1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ 955.79 million real chained 2019 US$ 53.83 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh
2020s 1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ 953.50 million real chained 2019 US$ 55.33 million real chained 2019 US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?
Bangladesh, at 1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 953.50 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
55.33 million real chained 2019 US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
Bangladesh ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/bangladesh/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-timber-real-chained-2019-us/bangladesh/sri-lanka/">Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.