Mexico vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, timber
Mexico
38.21 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
33.33 billion current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
17th
Zambia rank
20th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Mexico
- Zambia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 38.21 billion current US$ against 33.33 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 4.88 billion current US$.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.65 billion current US$ | 5.95 billion current US$ | 8.70 billion current US$ | Mexico |
| 2000s | 14.06 billion current US$ | 16.36 billion current US$ | 2.30 billion current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 37.08 billion current US$ | 36.95 billion current US$ | 126.10 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 38.21 billion current US$ | 33.33 billion current US$ | 4.88 billion current US$ | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Mexico or Zambia?
- Mexico, at 38.21 billion current US$ against 33.33 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Mexico and Zambia?
- 4.88 billion current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Mexico ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.