Malawi vs Spain: Renewable natural capital, timber
Malawi
7.04 billion current US$
in 2020
Spain
8.32 billion current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
61st
Spain rank
60th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Malawi
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 8.32 billion current US$ against 7.04 billion current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 1.28 billion current US$.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Spain ahead.
Malawi ranks 61st and Spain ranks 60th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.93 billion current US$ | 5.82 billion current US$ | 887.94 million current US$ | Spain |
| 2000s | 6.26 billion current US$ | 6.46 billion current US$ | 195.98 million current US$ | Spain |
| 2010s | 8.67 billion current US$ | 8.65 billion current US$ | 16.03 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 2020s | 7.04 billion current US$ | 8.32 billion current US$ | 1.28 billion current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Malawi or Spain?
- Spain, at 8.32 billion current US$ against 7.04 billion current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Malawi and Spain?
- 1.28 billion current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Spain?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Spain rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Malawi ranks 61st and Spain ranks 60th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.