Lithuania vs Norway: Renewable natural capital, timber
Lithuania
4.17 billion current US$
in 2020
Norway
4.57 billion current US$
in 2020
Lithuania rank
82nd
Norway rank
80th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Lithuania
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 4.57 billion current US$ against 4.17 billion current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 400.34 million current US$.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Norway ahead.
Lithuania ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 80th of 150 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.21 billion current US$ | 2.63 billion current US$ | 418.10 million current US$ | Norway |
| 2000s | 2.58 billion current US$ | 2.74 billion current US$ | 159.03 million current US$ | Norway |
| 2010s | 4.16 billion current US$ | 4.48 billion current US$ | 321.53 million current US$ | Norway |
| 2020s | 4.17 billion current US$ | 4.57 billion current US$ | 400.34 million current US$ | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Lithuania or Norway?
- Norway, at 4.57 billion current US$ against 4.17 billion current US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Lithuania and Norway?
- 400.34 million current US$, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Lithuania ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 80th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.