South Korea vs Peru: Renewable natural capital, timber
South Korea
5.97 billion current US$
in 2020
Peru
6.58 billion current US$
in 2020
South Korea rank
70th
Peru rank
67th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- South Korea
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 6.58 billion current US$ against 5.97 billion current US$ in South Korea, a difference of 614.36 million current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
South Korea ranks 70th and Peru ranks 67th of 150 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.89 billion current US$ | 3.26 billion current US$ | 1.37 billion current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 2.79 billion current US$ | 3.49 billion current US$ | 695.07 million current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 5.54 billion current US$ | 8.43 billion current US$ | 2.89 billion current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 5.97 billion current US$ | 6.58 billion current US$ | 614.36 million current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, South Korea or Peru?
- Peru, at 6.58 billion current US$ against 5.97 billion current US$ in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between South Korea and Peru?
- 614.36 million current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- South Korea ranks 70th and Peru ranks 67th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.