Ecuador vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, timber
Ecuador
8.49 billion current US$
in 2020
Malawi
7.04 billion current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
58th
Malawi rank
61st
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8.49 billion current US$ against 7.04 billion current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 1.45 billion current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 61st of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.61 billion current US$ | 4.93 billion current US$ | 675.78 million current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2.59 billion current US$ | 6.26 billion current US$ | 3.67 billion current US$ | Malawi |
| 2010s | 8.25 billion current US$ | 8.67 billion current US$ | 417.24 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 2020s | 8.49 billion current US$ | 7.04 billion current US$ | 1.45 billion current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 8.49 billion current US$ against 7.04 billion current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 1.45 billion current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Ecuador ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 61st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.