Congo vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, timber
Congo
10.91 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
11.36 billion current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
47th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 11.36 billion current US$ against 10.91 billion current US$ in Congo, a difference of 447.40 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.33 billion current US$ | 5.88 billion current US$ | 2.56 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 5.54 billion current US$ | 6.80 billion current US$ | 1.26 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 10.31 billion current US$ | 12.97 billion current US$ | 2.67 billion current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 10.91 billion current US$ | 11.36 billion current US$ | 447.40 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 11.36 billion current US$ against 10.91 billion current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 447.40 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Congo ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.