Belgium vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, timber
Belgium
2.17 billion current US$
in 2020
Namibia
2.17 billion current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
96th
Namibia rank
95th
Renewable natural capital, timber over time
- Belgium
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2.17 billion current US$ against 2.17 billion current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 330,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 96th and Namibia ranks 95th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.46 billion current US$ | 454.85 million current US$ | 1.01 billion current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 1.70 billion current US$ | 835.61 million current US$ | 864.42 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2.33 billion current US$ | 1.94 billion current US$ | 394.79 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2.17 billion current US$ | 2.17 billion current US$ | 330,000 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, timber, Belgium or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2.17 billion current US$ against 2.17 billion current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, timber between Belgium and Namibia?
- 330,000 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital, timber?
- Belgium ranks 96th and Namibia ranks 95th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.