South Africa vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
South Africa
4,925 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
4,860 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
78th
Sudan rank
80th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 4,925 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,860 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 65 real chained 2019 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
South Africa ranks 78th and Sudan ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5,217 real chained 2019 US$ | 5,577 real chained 2019 US$ | 359.86 real chained 2019 US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 4,925 real chained 2019 US$ | 4,860 real chained 2019 US$ | 65.82 real chained 2019 US$ | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, South Africa or Sudan?
- South Africa, at 4,925 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,860 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between South Africa and Sudan?
- 65 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- South Africa ranks 78th and Sudan ranks 80th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.