South Africa vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
South Africa
5,016 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
4,890 current US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
75th
Sudan rank
77th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 5,016 current US$ against 4,890 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 126 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 77th of 151 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5,150 current US$ | 4,940 current US$ | 209.87 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2020s | 5,016 current US$ | 4,890 current US$ | 126.88 current US$ | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, South Africa or Sudan?
- South Africa, at 5,016 current US$ against 4,890 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between South Africa and Sudan?
- 126 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- South Africa ranks 75th and Sudan ranks 77th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.