Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Rwanda
4,377 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
4,475 current US$
in 2020
Rwanda rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
92nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4,475 current US$ against 4,377 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 98 current US$.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,496 current US$ | 2,484 current US$ | 11.79 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 2,882 current US$ | 2,157 current US$ | 725.11 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4,825 current US$ | 3,853 current US$ | 972.14 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4,377 current US$ | 4,475 current US$ | 98.21 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4,475 current US$ against 4,377 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 98 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Rwanda ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.