Oman vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Oman
4,142 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
4,020 current US$
in 2020
Oman rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Oman
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Oman currently reports 4,142 current US$ against 4,020 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 122 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Oman ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,290 current US$ | 2,219 current US$ | 928.9 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,594 current US$ | 3,843 current US$ | 2,248 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2,545 current US$ | 5,350 current US$ | 2,806 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,142 current US$ | 4,020 current US$ | 121.9 current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Oman or Zimbabwe?
- Oman, at 4,142 current US$ against 4,020 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Oman and Zimbabwe?
- 122 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Oman and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Oman ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.