South Korea vs Saudi Arabia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
South Korea
2,869 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
2,964 current US$
in 2020
South Korea rank
127th
Saudi Arabia rank
124th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- South Korea
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 2,964 current US$ against 2,869 current US$ in South Korea, a difference of 95 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 127th and Saudi Arabia ranks 124th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,419 current US$ | 1,475 current US$ | 944.15 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2000s | 2,985 current US$ | 1,614 current US$ | 1,371 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2010s | 3,343 current US$ | 2,352 current US$ | 991.73 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2020s | 2,869 current US$ | 2,964 current US$ | 95.32 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, South Korea or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 2,964 current US$ against 2,869 current US$ in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between South Korea and Saudi Arabia?
- 95 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Saudi Arabia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- South Korea ranks 127th and Saudi Arabia ranks 124th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.