South Korea vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
South Korea
2,869 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
2,785 current US$
in 2020
South Korea rank
127th
Mauritius rank
128th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- South Korea
- Mauritius
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 2,869 current US$ against 2,785 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 84 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
South Korea ranks 127th and Mauritius ranks 128th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,419 current US$ | 4,290 current US$ | 1,872 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 2,985 current US$ | 3,290 current US$ | 305.1 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 3,343 current US$ | 3,808 current US$ | 464.15 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2,869 current US$ | 2,785 current US$ | 83.9 current US$ | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, South Korea or Mauritius?
- South Korea, at 2,869 current US$ against 2,785 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between South Korea and Mauritius?
- 84 current US$, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- South Korea ranks 127th and Mauritius ranks 128th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.