Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Kazakhstan
1,992 current US$
in 2020
Mauritania
2,044 current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
136th
Mauritania rank
135th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 2,044 current US$ against 1,992 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 52 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 136th and Mauritania ranks 135th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,137 current US$ | 1,421 current US$ | 716.17 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 2,826 current US$ | 1,196 current US$ | 1,630 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2,273 current US$ | 1,679 current US$ | 594.71 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1,992 current US$ | 2,044 current US$ | 51.56 current US$ | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 2,044 current US$ against 1,992 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 52 current US$, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Kazakhstan ranks 136th and Mauritania ranks 135th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.