Iceland vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Iceland
28,469 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
31,348 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
4th
Suriname rank
3rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Iceland
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 31,348 current US$ against 28,469 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 2,879 current US$.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,613 current US$ | 9,353 current US$ | 10,260 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2000s | 20,623 current US$ | 14,409 current US$ | 6,214 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2010s | 28,527 current US$ | 29,987 current US$ | 1,460 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 28,469 current US$ | 31,348 current US$ | 2,878 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Iceland or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 31,348 current US$ against 28,469 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Iceland and Suriname?
- 2,879 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Iceland ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 3rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.