Hungary vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Hungary
7,150 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
7,166 current US$
in 2020
Hungary rank
46th
Zambia rank
45th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Hungary
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 7,166 current US$ against 7,150 current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 16 current US$.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Hungary ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,718 current US$ | 4,078 current US$ | 359.99 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 5,184 current US$ | 5,241 current US$ | 57.08 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 7,576 current US$ | 8,376 current US$ | 800.76 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 7,150 current US$ | 7,166 current US$ | 15.9 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Hungary or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 7,166 current US$ against 7,150 current US$ in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Hungary and Zambia?
- 16 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Hungary ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.