Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Ecuador
4,438 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
4,475 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
92nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4,475 current US$ against 4,438 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 37 current US$.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Ecuador ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,658 current US$ | 2,484 current US$ | 825.78 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 2,702 current US$ | 2,157 current US$ | 545.52 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3,902 current US$ | 3,853 current US$ | 49.02 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 4,438 current US$ | 4,475 current US$ | 36.67 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4,475 current US$ against 4,438 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 37 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Ecuador ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.