Croatia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Croatia
7,207 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
7,166 current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
44th
Zambia rank
45th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Croatia
- Zambia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 7,207 current US$ against 7,166 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 41 current US$.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Croatia ranks 44th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,498 current US$ | 4,078 current US$ | 420.34 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 6,039 current US$ | 5,241 current US$ | 798.09 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 7,782 current US$ | 8,376 current US$ | 594.76 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 7,207 current US$ | 7,166 current US$ | 40.37 current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Croatia or Zambia?
- Croatia, at 7,207 current US$ against 7,166 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Croatia and Zambia?
- 41 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Croatia ranks 44th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.