Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Congo
7,104 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
7,166 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
47th
Zambia rank
45th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 7,166 current US$ against 7,104 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 62 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Congo ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,448 current US$ | 4,078 current US$ | 369.9 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 5,736 current US$ | 5,241 current US$ | 494.98 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 7,463 current US$ | 8,376 current US$ | 912.79 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 7,104 current US$ | 7,166 current US$ | 62.42 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Congo or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 7,166 current US$ against 7,104 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Congo and Zambia?
- 62 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Congo ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.