Congo vs Croatia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Congo
7,104 current US$
in 2020
Croatia
7,207 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
47th
Croatia rank
44th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 7,207 current US$ against 7,104 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 103 current US$.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 47th and Croatia ranks 44th of 150 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,448 current US$ | 4,498 current US$ | 50.44 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 5,736 current US$ | 6,039 current US$ | 303.1 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 7,463 current US$ | 7,782 current US$ | 318.03 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 7,104 current US$ | 7,207 current US$ | 102.79 current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Congo or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 7,207 current US$ against 7,104 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Congo and Croatia?
- 103 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Congo ranks 47th and Croatia ranks 44th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.