Chile vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Chile
8,700 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
8,619 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
30th
Serbia rank
31st
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 8,700 current US$ against 8,619 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 81 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,064 current US$ | 6,669 current US$ | 1,395 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 8,705 current US$ | 7,449 current US$ | 1,257 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 8,700 current US$ | 8,619 current US$ | 81.33 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 8,700 current US$ against 8,619 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Chile and Serbia?
- 81 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Chile ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.