Chile vs Egypt: Renewable natural capital per capita, total

Chile
8,700 current US$
in 2020
Egypt
8,324 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
30th
Egypt rank
33rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Chile
  • Egypt
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 8,700 current US$ against 8,324 current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 376 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 30th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 150 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 3,718 current US$ 3,460 current US$ 257.75 current US$ Chile
2000s 5,650 current US$ 3,822 current US$ 1,828 current US$ Chile
2010s 8,705 current US$ 5,134 current US$ 3,571 current US$ Chile
2020s 8,700 current US$ 8,324 current US$ 376.25 current US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Chile or Egypt?
Chile, at 8,700 current US$ against 8,324 current US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Chile and Egypt?
376 current US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Egypt?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Egypt rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
Chile ranks 30th and Egypt ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed