Cambodia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, total

Cambodia
8,450 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
8,619 current US$
in 2020
Cambodia rank
32nd
Serbia rank
31st

Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Cambodia
  • Serbia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 8,619 current US$ against 8,450 current US$ in Cambodia, a difference of 169 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 150 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 4,533 current US$ 6,669 current US$ 2,136 current US$ Serbia
2010s 7,782 current US$ 7,449 current US$ 333.65 current US$ Cambodia
2020s 8,450 current US$ 8,619 current US$ 168.99 current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Cambodia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 8,619 current US$ against 8,450 current US$ in Cambodia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Cambodia and Serbia?
169 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Cambodia and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
Cambodia ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed