Brazil vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, total

Brazil
7,790 current US$
in 2020
Eswatini
7,978 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
38th
Eswatini rank
37th

Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Brazil
  • Eswatini
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k14.0k199520072020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7,978 current US$ against 7,790 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 188 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 38th and Eswatini ranks 37th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 7,043 current US$ 5,105 current US$ 1,938 current US$ Brazil
2000s 6,259 current US$ 4,925 current US$ 1,334 current US$ Brazil
2010s 10,554 current US$ 8,166 current US$ 2,387 current US$ Brazil
2020s 7,790 current US$ 7,978 current US$ 188.46 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Brazil or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 7,978 current US$ against 7,790 current US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Brazil and Eswatini?
188 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
Brazil ranks 38th and Eswatini ranks 37th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed