Bolivia vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Bolivia
2,935 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
2,785 current US$
in 2020
Bolivia rank
125th
Mauritius rank
128th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Bolivia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 2,935 current US$ against 2,785 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 150 current US$.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Bolivia ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 128th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,888 current US$ | 4,290 current US$ | 2,403 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,758 current US$ | 3,290 current US$ | 1,533 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 3,039 current US$ | 3,808 current US$ | 769.11 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2,935 current US$ | 2,785 current US$ | 149.87 current US$ | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Bolivia or Mauritius?
- Bolivia, at 2,935 current US$ against 2,785 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 150 current US$, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Bolivia ranks 125th and Mauritius ranks 128th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.