Belgium vs Comoros: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Belgium
2,572 current US$
in 2020
Comoros
2,447 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
133rd
Comoros rank
134th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Belgium
- Comoros
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2,572 current US$ against 2,447 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 125 current US$.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 133rd and Comoros ranks 134th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,499 current US$ | 1,963 current US$ | 536.54 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 2,515 current US$ | 2,125 current US$ | 390.29 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,785 current US$ | 3,629 current US$ | 844.32 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2020s | 2,572 current US$ | 2,447 current US$ | 124.61 current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Belgium or Comoros?
- Belgium, at 2,572 current US$ against 2,447 current US$ in Comoros as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Belgium and Comoros?
- 125 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Comoros?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Comoros rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Belgium ranks 133rd and Comoros ranks 134th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.