Australia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Australia
40,252 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
31,348 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
Suriname rank
3rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Australia
- Suriname
How they compare
Australia currently reports 40,252 current US$ against 31,348 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 8,904 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 3rd of 150 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,896 current US$ | 9,353 current US$ | 21,543 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 29,280 current US$ | 14,409 current US$ | 14,872 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 45,956 current US$ | 29,987 current US$ | 15,970 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 40,252 current US$ | 31,348 current US$ | 8,904 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Australia or Suriname?
- Australia, at 40,252 current US$ against 31,348 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Australia and Suriname?
- 8,904 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Suriname ranks 3rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.