Australia vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, total
Australia
40,252 current US$
in 2020
Iceland
28,469 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
Iceland rank
4th
Renewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Australia
- Iceland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 40,252 current US$ against 28,469 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 11,783 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 4th of 150 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,896 current US$ | 19,613 current US$ | 11,283 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 29,280 current US$ | 20,623 current US$ | 8,657 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 45,956 current US$ | 28,527 current US$ | 17,430 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 40,252 current US$ | 28,469 current US$ | 11,782 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, total, Australia or Iceland?
- Australia, at 40,252 current US$ against 28,469 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, total between Australia and Iceland?
- 11,783 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 4th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.