Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Serbia
704.72 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
681.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
50th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Serbia
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 681.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 23.6 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Serbia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 766.97 real chained 2019 US$ 876.74 real chained 2019 US$ 109.77 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 726.67 real chained 2019 US$ 774.73 real chained 2019 US$ 48.06 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ 681.12 real chained 2019 US$ 23.59 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
Serbia, at 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 681.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
23.6 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Serbia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zimbabwe/">Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.