Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Saudi Arabia
5.71 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tunisia
5.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
136th
Tunisia rank
135th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Tunisia
246810199520072020

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 5.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.71 real chained 2019 US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.04 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 10.32 real chained 2019 US$ 2.17 real chained 2019 US$ 8.16 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2000s 8.45 real chained 2019 US$ 4.09 real chained 2019 US$ 4.36 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2010s 6.35 real chained 2019 US$ 6.06 real chained 2019 US$ 0.2835 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2020s 5.71 real chained 2019 US$ 5.75 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0366 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Saudi Arabia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 5.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 5.71 real chained 2019 US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
0.04 real chained 2019 US$, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Saudi Arabia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Saudi Arabia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/saudi-arabia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/saudi-arabia/tunisia/">Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.