Poland vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Poland
696.09 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sierra Leone
734.83 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Poland rank
49th
Sierra Leone rank
46th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Poland
  • Sierra Leone
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 734.83 real chained 2019 US$ against 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland, a difference of 38.74 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 49th and Sierra Leone ranks 46th of 151 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 695.55 real chained 2019 US$ 1,622 real chained 2019 US$ 926.08 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2000s 684.15 real chained 2019 US$ 1,241 real chained 2019 US$ 556.69 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2010s 688.86 real chained 2019 US$ 877.99 real chained 2019 US$ 189.13 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone
2020s 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ 734.83 real chained 2019 US$ 38.74 real chained 2019 US$ Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Poland or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 734.83 real chained 2019 US$ against 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Poland and Sierra Leone?
38.74 real chained 2019 US$, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sierra Leone?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Poland and Sierra Leone rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Poland ranks 49th and Sierra Leone ranks 46th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/poland/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/poland/sierra-leone/">Poland vs Sierra Leone: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.