Poland vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Poland
696.09 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
704.72 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Poland rank
49th
Serbia rank
47th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Poland
  • Serbia
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland, a difference of 8.63 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 47th of 151 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 683.77 real chained 2019 US$ 766.97 real chained 2019 US$ 83.19 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 688.86 real chained 2019 US$ 726.67 real chained 2019 US$ 37.81 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ 8.63 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Poland or Serbia?
Serbia, at 704.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 696.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Poland and Serbia?
8.63 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Poland and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Poland ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 47th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/poland/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/poland/serbia/">Poland vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.