Peru vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Peru
199.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uganda
200.21 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Peru rank
99th
Uganda rank
98th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Peru
  • Uganda
200300400500600199520072020

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 200.21 real chained 2019 US$ against 199.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Peru, a difference of 0.64 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Peru ranks 99th and Uganda ranks 98th of 151 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 274.3 real chained 2019 US$ 571.46 real chained 2019 US$ 297.16 real chained 2019 US$ Uganda
2000s 245.95 real chained 2019 US$ 414.46 real chained 2019 US$ 168.51 real chained 2019 US$ Uganda
2010s 219.45 real chained 2019 US$ 265.19 real chained 2019 US$ 45.74 real chained 2019 US$ Uganda
2020s 199.57 real chained 2019 US$ 200.21 real chained 2019 US$ 0.637 real chained 2019 US$ Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Peru or Uganda?
Uganda, at 200.21 real chained 2019 US$ against 199.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Peru as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Peru and Uganda?
0.64 real chained 2019 US$, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Peru ranks 99th and Uganda ranks 98th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/peru/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/peru/uganda/">Peru vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.