Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Papua New Guinea
1,238 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovenia
1,340 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
25th
Slovenia rank
24th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Slovenia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1,340 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 102 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,468 real chained 2019 US$ 1,566 real chained 2019 US$ 902.9 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1,919 real chained 2019 US$ 1,483 real chained 2019 US$ 435.41 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 1,423 real chained 2019 US$ 1,389 real chained 2019 US$ 34.52 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ 1,340 real chained 2019 US$ 101.75 real chained 2019 US$ Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Papua New Guinea or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 1,340 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
102 real chained 2019 US$, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/slovenia/">Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.