Papua New Guinea vs Slovakia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Papua New Guinea
1,238 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovakia
1,099 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
25th
Slovakia rank
27th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Slovakia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,099 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovakia, a difference of 139 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Slovakia ranks 27th of 151 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,468 real chained 2019 US$ 1,132 real chained 2019 US$ 1,337 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1,919 real chained 2019 US$ 1,115 real chained 2019 US$ 803.63 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 1,423 real chained 2019 US$ 1,105 real chained 2019 US$ 318.1 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ 1,099 real chained 2019 US$ 139.32 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Papua New Guinea or Slovakia?
Papua New Guinea, at 1,238 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,099 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovakia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
139 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Slovakia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Slovakia ranks 27th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Slovakia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/slovak-republic/">Papua New Guinea vs Slovakia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.