Mongolia vs Rwanda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Mongolia
148.42 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Rwanda
131.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
107th
Rwanda rank
108th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Mongolia
  • Rwanda
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 148.42 real chained 2019 US$ against 131.99 real chained 2019 US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 16.43 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mongolia ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 168.14 real chained 2019 US$ 263.37 real chained 2019 US$ 95.23 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2000s 154.54 real chained 2019 US$ 195.47 real chained 2019 US$ 40.93 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2010s 155.66 real chained 2019 US$ 147.57 real chained 2019 US$ 8.1 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia
2020s 148.42 real chained 2019 US$ 131.99 real chained 2019 US$ 16.43 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Mongolia or Rwanda?
Mongolia, at 148.42 real chained 2019 US$ against 131.99 real chained 2019 US$ in Rwanda as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Mongolia and Rwanda?
16.43 real chained 2019 US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Rwanda rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Mongolia ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.