Mexico vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Mexico
249.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ukraine
236.62 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
87th
Ukraine rank
90th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Mexico
  • Ukraine
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 249.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 236.62 real chained 2019 US$ in Ukraine, a difference of 12.58 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 87th and Ukraine ranks 90th of 151 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 355.1 real chained 2019 US$ 202.84 real chained 2019 US$ 152.26 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 310.68 real chained 2019 US$ 222.02 real chained 2019 US$ 88.66 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 266.44 real chained 2019 US$ 231.7 real chained 2019 US$ 34.73 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 249.2 real chained 2019 US$ 236.62 real chained 2019 US$ 12.58 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Mexico or Ukraine?
Mexico, at 249.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 236.62 real chained 2019 US$ in Ukraine as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Mexico and Ukraine?
12.58 real chained 2019 US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Ukraine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Ukraine rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Mexico ranks 87th and Ukraine ranks 90th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/ukraine/">Mexico vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.