Malaysia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Malaysia
4,635 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
4,746 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia rank
7th
Uruguay rank
6th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Malaysia
  • Uruguay
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 111 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 7,578 real chained 2019 US$ 2,957 real chained 2019 US$ 4,621 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2000s 6,116 real chained 2019 US$ 3,699 real chained 2019 US$ 2,417 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2010s 5,036 real chained 2019 US$ 4,448 real chained 2019 US$ 587.58 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2020s 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ 110.46 real chained 2019 US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Malaysia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Malaysia and Uruguay?
111 real chained 2019 US$, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Malaysia ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/uruguay/">Malaysia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.