Malawi vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Malawi
354.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama
314.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
79th
Panama rank
81st

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Malawi
  • Panama
4006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 314.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama, a difference of 39.92 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 79th and Panama ranks 81st of 151 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 934.52 real chained 2019 US$ 509.34 real chained 2019 US$ 425.18 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 706.55 real chained 2019 US$ 430.84 real chained 2019 US$ 275.7 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 457.04 real chained 2019 US$ 350.13 real chained 2019 US$ 106.91 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ 314.45 real chained 2019 US$ 39.92 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Malawi or Panama?
Malawi, at 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 314.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Panama as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Malawi and Panama?
39.92 real chained 2019 US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Panama?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Panama rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Malawi ranks 79th and Panama ranks 81st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/malawi/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/malawi/panama/">Malawi vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.