Liberia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Liberia
2,266 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
2,679 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Liberia rank
15th
Sweden rank
12th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Liberia
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 2,679 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ in Liberia, a difference of 413 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 5,231 real chained 2019 US$ 3,153 real chained 2019 US$ 2,078 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2000s 3,729 real chained 2019 US$ 3,084 real chained 2019 US$ 644.85 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2010s 2,604 real chained 2019 US$ 2,839 real chained 2019 US$ 234.92 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2020s 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ 2,679 real chained 2019 US$ 412.59 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Liberia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 2,679 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ in Liberia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Liberia and Sweden?
413 real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Liberia and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Liberia ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/liberia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/liberia/sweden/">Liberia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.