Lesotho vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Lesotho
41.29 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia
29.96 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lesotho rank
123rd
Saint Lucia rank
125th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Lesotho
  • Saint Lucia
01020304050199520072020

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 29.96 real chained 2019 US$ in Saint Lucia, a difference of 11.33 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.4 times Saint Lucia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 123rd and Saint Lucia ranks 125th of 151 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 47.29 real chained 2019 US$ 37.26 real chained 2019 US$ 10.03 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2000s 46.73 real chained 2019 US$ 33 real chained 2019 US$ 13.73 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2010s 44.06 real chained 2019 US$ 30.68 real chained 2019 US$ 13.38 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2020s 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ 29.96 real chained 2019 US$ 11.32 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Lesotho or Saint Lucia?
Lesotho, at 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 29.96 real chained 2019 US$ in Saint Lucia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Lesotho and Saint Lucia?
11.33 real chained 2019 US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Lesotho and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Lesotho ranks 123rd and Saint Lucia ranks 125th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/lesotho/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/lesotho/st-lucia/">Lesotho vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.