Korea vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Korea
121.68 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Nepal
125.68 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Korea rank
112th
Nepal rank
109th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Korea
  • Nepal
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 125.68 real chained 2019 US$ against 121.68 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea, a difference of 4 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 112th and Nepal ranks 109th of 151 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 142.38 real chained 2019 US$ 153.15 real chained 2019 US$ 10.77 real chained 2019 US$ Nepal
2000s 134.37 real chained 2019 US$ 139.61 real chained 2019 US$ 5.25 real chained 2019 US$ Nepal
2010s 125.55 real chained 2019 US$ 132.92 real chained 2019 US$ 7.38 real chained 2019 US$ Nepal
2020s 121.68 real chained 2019 US$ 125.68 real chained 2019 US$ 4 real chained 2019 US$ Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Korea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 125.68 real chained 2019 US$ against 121.68 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Korea and Nepal?
4 real chained 2019 US$, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Nepal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Korea and Nepal rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Korea ranks 112th and Nepal ranks 109th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/korea-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/korea-rep/nepal/">Korea vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.