Japan vs Luxembourg: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Japan
249.18 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Luxembourg
241.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Japan rank
88th
Luxembourg rank
89th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Japan
  • Luxembourg
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Japan currently reports 249.18 real chained 2019 US$ against 241.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Luxembourg, a difference of 7.21 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Japan ranks 88th and Luxembourg ranks 89th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 249.2 real chained 2019 US$ 354.43 real chained 2019 US$ 105.23 real chained 2019 US$ Luxembourg
2000s 246.25 real chained 2019 US$ 325.31 real chained 2019 US$ 79.05 real chained 2019 US$ Luxembourg
2010s 247.3 real chained 2019 US$ 272 real chained 2019 US$ 24.7 real chained 2019 US$ Luxembourg
2020s 249.18 real chained 2019 US$ 241.97 real chained 2019 US$ 7.21 real chained 2019 US$ Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Japan or Luxembourg?
Japan, at 249.18 real chained 2019 US$ against 241.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Luxembourg as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Japan and Luxembourg?
7.21 real chained 2019 US$, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Luxembourg?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Japan and Luxembourg rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Japan ranks 88th and Luxembourg ranks 89th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Luxembourg: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/japan/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/japan/luxembourg/">Japan vs Luxembourg: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.