Iraq vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Iraq
5.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Singapore
2.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
137th
Singapore rank
141st

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Iraq
  • Singapore
246810199520072020

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 5.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 2.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Singapore, a difference of 2.8 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iraq's figure about 2.1 times Singapore's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 141st of 151 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 10.11 real chained 2019 US$ 4.07 real chained 2019 US$ 6.04 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2000s 8.25 real chained 2019 US$ 3.74 real chained 2019 US$ 4.51 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2010s 6.27 real chained 2019 US$ 2.88 real chained 2019 US$ 3.39 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq
2020s 5.37 real chained 2019 US$ 2.57 real chained 2019 US$ 2.8 real chained 2019 US$ Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Iraq or Singapore?
Iraq, at 5.37 real chained 2019 US$ against 2.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Singapore as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Iraq and Singapore?
2.8 real chained 2019 US$, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iraq and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Iraq ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 141st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/iraq/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/iraq/singapore/">Iraq vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.