Guinea vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Guinea
1,098 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,053 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
28th
Montenegro rank
30th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Guinea
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 1,098 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 45 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 28th and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,602 real chained 2019 US$ 1,033 real chained 2019 US$ 569.81 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2010s 1,315 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 262.01 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2020s 1,098 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 44.56 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guinea or Montenegro?
Guinea, at 1,098 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guinea and Montenegro?
45 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Guinea ranks 28th and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/montenegro/">Guinea vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.